Disclosure: TheBestVPN is reader-supported. When you buy a VPN through links on our site, we may earn commissions. Learn more.

proXPN Review

Rob Mardisalu

Rob Mardisalu

Founder and writer of TheBestVPN.com

⚠️ This VPN is no longer actively maintained or reviewed

This VPN service is either no longer operational or no longer meets our current testing and review standards.

For up-to-date, independently tested options, see our Recommended VPN Services.

Despite being in the online security industry for almost a decade before its discontinuation, proXPN remained a relatively unknown player in the VPN market. The service’s eventual shutdown validates many of the concerns raised during its operational years about subpar performance and outdated security standards.

This retrospective analysis examines why proXPN failed to compete with modern VPN standards and what lessons users can learn when selecting VPN services.

Was proXPN’s relative anonymity and eventual discontinuation due to subpar service or inadequate adaptation to modern VPN standards?

Based on extensive research and the service’s ultimate discontinuation, the answer is clearly subpar service combined with failure to modernize security protocols and infrastructure.

What was proXPN?

proXPN review and homepage - service now discontinued

Service Status: Discontinued (2020-2024)

Founded in 2009, proXPN operated for approximately 11-15 years before shutting down. During its operational period, the service offered a basic freemium VPN that never successfully competed with industry leaders.

The service originally supported:

  • Windows
  • Mac
  • Linux (Premium only)
  • iOS (Premium only)
  • Android (Premium only)

With headquarters located in the Netherlands, proXPN operated within Nine Eyes territory, which presented significant privacy concerns even during its operational years. The Netherlands is a member of the Nine Eyes Alliance, an intelligence-sharing framework where members cooperate to circumvent local privacy laws.

ProXPN Historical Overview

SERVICE STATUS: N/A
OPERATIONAL PERIOD: 2009-2024
FINAL RANKING: Poor Performance
USABILITY: Outdated and unreliable
LOG FILES: Claimed No Logging
SERVERS: 19 servers, 12 countries
SUPPORT: No longer available
ENCRYPTION: Outdated 512-bit BF-CBC (Vulnerable)
MODERN STANDARD: AES-256 (Industry Standard)
LAST PRICE: $6.25/mo (Overpriced)

ProXPN Features – Why It Failed to Compete

proXPN’s feature set was severely limited compared to modern VPN standards. The service offered both free and paid versions, but neither provided competitive functionality.

Critical Limitations:

  • Only 19 servers in 12 countries (Modern VPNs offer 3,000+ servers in 60+ countries)
  • No browser extensions (Standard feature)
  • No router support (Essential for home network protection)
  • No smart TV compatibility (Critical for streaming)
  • No split tunneling (Standard security feature)
  • No ad blocking (Common VPN feature today)
  • Maximum 4 simultaneous connections (Modern VPNs offer unlimited)

VPN Standard Features (Missing from proXPN):

  • WireGuard protocol support
  • Double VPN/Multi-hop
  • Threat protection
  • Dark web monitoring
  • Dedicated IP options
  • Meshnet functionality
  • Advanced kill switch

The service’s device compatibility list was minimal compared to modern VPN providers that support routers, gaming consoles, smart TVs, and specialized devices.

Was proXPN Safe? Security Analysis

Critical Security Flaws:

proXPN’s security standards were significantly below industry norms even during its operational period, and would be considered completely inadequate by current standards.

Encryption Standards – Major Security Vulnerability

proXPN used outdated 512-bit BF-CBC encryption, while most competitors had long upgraded to 256-bit AES military-grade encryption. The service used BF-CBC encryption algorithm, which became vulnerable after the SWEET32 attack was demonstrated in 2016.

Security Standards Comparison:

  • proXPN (Outdated): 512-bit BF-CBC encryption
  • Standard: AES-256 encryption, the gold standard trusted by the U.S. government and security experts worldwide
  • Modern Alternative: ChaCha20 encryption (via WireGuard) for optimal performance

AES-256 provides 2^256 or 1.1 x 10^77 possible combinations, making brute-force attacks infeasible even with all the world’s most powerful supercomputers.

Jurisdiction Concerns

proXPN’s Netherlands jurisdiction presented significant privacy risks. The Netherlands is a member of the Nine Eyes Alliance, which allows member countries to share intelligence and potentially circumvent local privacy laws.

Recommended Jurisdictions:

  • Panama – No data retention laws (NordVPN)
  • Switzerland – Strong privacy laws (Proton VPN)
  • British Virgin Islands – Privacy-friendly (ExpressVPN)

Protocol Support

proXPN offered limited protocol support:

  • OpenVPN (Acceptable but outdated implementation)
  • PPTP (Completely insecure)
  • IPSec (Basic support)

Missing Modern Protocols:

  • WireGuard – Cutting-edge protocol known for simplicity, speed, and advanced cryptographic design
  • Proprietary protocols – NordLynx, Lightway, etc.

Why proXPN Failed – Critical Issues

1. Obsolete Security Standards

The bulk of proXPN’s client hadn’t been updated for almost three years, including the bundled version of OpenVPN. Mobile apps were last updated in 2017, demonstrating a complete lack of maintenance and security updates.

Modern VPN Security Requirements:

  • AES-256 encryption as the minimum standard
  • Regular security audits and updates
  • Perfect Forward Secrecy
  • DNS leak protection
  • IPv6 leak protection
  • WebRTC leak protection

2. Poor Performance and Reliability

Speed tests during proXPN’s operational period showed:

proXPN historical speed test results - significantly below modern standards

Historical Performance (100 Mbps baseline):

  • EU Server: 40.3 Mbps download (60% speed loss)
  • US Server: 16.14 Mbps download (84% speed loss)
  • UK Server: 40.15 Mbps download (60% speed loss)

VPN Performance Standards:

  • Top-tier VPNs maintain 80-95% of original speed
  • Modern VPNs provide speeds up to 100+ Mbps with optimized protocols
  • WireGuard protocol delivers superior performance

3. Limited Streaming and Geo-unblocking

proXPN’s streaming capabilities were severely limited:

  • Netflix: Inconsistent access to US Netflix only
  • Other Platforms: Unable to unblock BBC iPlayer, Disney+, Hulu, Amazon Prime Video, and HBO

Streaming Requirements:

  • Consistent access to 15+ streaming platforms
  • Optimized streaming servers
  • 4K/HDR streaming support
  • Smart DNS functionality

4. Inadequate Customer Support

proXPN’s support links redirected to expired domains controlled by someone else, creating potential security risks. The company’s inability to maintain basic website functionality demonstrated poor operational standards.

VPN Alternatives – Modern Security Standards

Following proXPN’s discontinuation, users should consider these industry-leading alternatives that meet security standards:

1. NordVPN – Best Overall Security

  • Jurisdiction: Panama (privacy-friendly)
  • Encryption: AES-256-GCM with 4096-bit DH key
  • Protocols: OpenVPN and proprietary NordLynx (based on WireGuard)
  • Servers: 5,500+ servers in 60+ countries
  • Features: Double VPN, Onion over VPN, CyberSec protection
  • Audit Status: Independently audited no-logs policy

2. ExpressVPN – Premium Performance

  • Jurisdiction: British Virgin Islands
  • Encryption: AES-256 with proprietary Lightway protocol
  • Protocols: Lightway, OpenVPN, IKEv2 with AES-256-GCM and ChaCha20/Poly1305 ciphers
  • Servers: 3,000+ servers in 94+ countries
  • Features: TrustedServer technology, MediaStreamer DNS
  • Performance: Consistently fastest speeds in testing

3. Proton VPN – Privacy-Focused

  • Jurisdiction: Switzerland (strict privacy laws)
  • Encryption: AES-256 encryption standard
  • Features: Secure Core (multi-hop), NetShield ad-blocker
  • Transparency: Open-source applications
  • Free Tier: Genuinely unlimited free option available

Key Features Missing from proXPN:

  • Modern Encryption: AES-256 and ChaCha20 provide the strongest VPN encryption available
  • WireGuard Support: Next-generation protocol for speed and security
  • Independent Audits: Regular third-party security verification
  • RAM-only Servers: Enhanced privacy protection
  • Advanced Kill Switch: Application-specific protection
  • Split Tunneling: Selective VPN routing
  • Unlimited Connections: Protect all devices

Conclusion & Lessons Learned from proXPN’s Failure

proXPN’s discontinuation after over a decade in operation serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of maintaining modern security standards and adapting to evolving user needs.

Why proXPN Failed:

  1. Security Negligence: Continued use of vulnerable 512-bit BF-CBC encryption years after safer alternatives became standard
  2. Lack of Innovation: Failed to implement modern protocols like WireGuard
  3. Poor Infrastructure: Minimal server network and unreliable connections
  4. Inadequate Maintenance: Applications went years without updates, creating security vulnerabilities
  5. Overpricing: Premium pricing for substandard service
  6. Jurisdiction Issues: Netherlands location in Nine Eyes surveillance alliance

VPN Selection Criteria (Lessons from proXPN):

  • Encryption Standard: AES-256 is virtually impenetrable and trusted by governments, militaries, and corporations worldwide
  • Protocol Support: OpenVPN for reliability, WireGuard for speed, IKEv2/IPSec for mobile stability
  • Jurisdiction: Choose VPN providers outside 5/9/14 Eyes countries for maximum privacy protection
  • Regular Updates: Active development and security patch deployment
  • Independent Audits: Third-party verification of security claims
  • Server Network: Extensive global coverage for optimal performance
  • Modern Features: Advanced kill switch, split tunneling, ad blocking

Bottom Line: proXPN’s failure demonstrates why users should prioritize VPN providers that invest in modern security infrastructure, maintain regular updates, and operate under privacy-friendly jurisdictions. Leading VPN services like NordVPN, ExpressVPN, and Proton VPN offer military-grade AES-256 encryption, modern protocols, and comprehensive security features that proXPN never achieved.

VPN recommendations that meet security standards, consider ExpressVPN, NordVPN, or Proton VPN – all of which offer the security, performance, and reliability that proXPN failed to deliver.

Share Your VPN Experience

Have you experienced other discontinued VPN services or want to share your VPN recommendations? We’d love to hear about your experiences with modern VPN providers and what features matter most to you.

    To keep up the quality content on our website, we only accept user reviews that provide valuable information for our visitors. Not all reviews will be published. If you want your review to be accepted, please write a helpful, informative and unique review - either positive or negative. Thank you for your support!

    By clicking the button below, I acknowledge that I have read and accept the Terms of Use.

    11 user reviews for proXPN

    AJ 1/10 July 30, 2020

    ProXPN - Rip-Off Artists

    Absolutely horrible experience. Connection lost constantly. Asked for support, and their advice screwed up all my network connections. Eventually said it doesn't matter anyway because your subscription had run out - first I learned of that - so I resubscribed, hoping that would solve the problem. It didn't and I asked for a refund. They said I would receive a full refund, but that was a lie - I was ripped off. Avoid this VPN at all costs!

    Pass on ProXPN 1/10 April 24, 2020

    ProXPN is a scam

    You cannot cancel the account via the website. They will still attempt to charge the payments. No support, no response. Their Twitter page is no longer available.

    Do not give them payment info or start a trial.

    Matt 10/10 February 13, 2020

    Worked fine for me

    I see a lot of reviews calling proXPN a "scam" or that people were unable to unsubscribe, so I wanted to share my positive experience with proXPN... I emailed customer service yesterday at 7:30PM asking to cancel, they responded within 20 minutes, and it was cancelled today at 7:08 AM (CST).

    Dave 1/10 November 6, 2019

    Worst VPN

    I have used a number of premium VPNs over the years. VPNs are dirt cheap, so why not. One of them is proXPN. It works barely at all. Most of the locations can't connect and those that do are super slow. Their web support site has outdated information and the clients are primitive in functionality. There is a Linux CLI client on Github, which works... sometimes. After having tried perhaps a dozen or so premium VPN subscriptions, proXPN has the worst performance.

    Coley 9/10 August 5, 2019

    Maybe it's just you?

    I'm based in Canada with a 100Mbit connection at home and I can get upwards of 80-90Mbit download over their closest locations in Canada and the USA. Note - they do have an iOS app to use the service on iPhone/iPad. I signed up a few years back at $45 USD/year and never looked back. The only feature I'm missing is the ability to connect via AppleTV to get around the Netflix location based content... just more to torrent I guess.

    Abbie 5/10 June 28, 2019

    Limited, but have a lifetime account

    I got a lifetime account for like 40 usd a while ago. The Windows client was very bad, it would lose the internet connection but it did never restart automatically, so after a while you simply notice that no torrents have been downloading and voila, the connection was down.

    It does work with Synology though.

    Vipin Bhatia 1/10 May 4, 2019

    Scam Alert:Unable to unsubscribe

    I had no intention of renewing after 3 months but when i go to the URL to unsubscribe the service, it fails to load on any of the browsers. It’s obvious the company is trying some convoluted strategy to prevent people from unsubscribing because all other pages work just fine on the website, so you can sign up with the service but not unsubscribe.

    Crash Gordon 8/10 April 13, 2019

    Bitcoin got me unlimited ProXPN!

    Several years ago ProXPN had a special offer for a 2-year plan that cost $50 payable in Bitcoin. I jumped on that and the service has been acceptable. When my 2 years ran out, the account continued to work! I'm on year 4 or 5 now, and my only complaint is that their updated client made the machine unavailable through SMB. So I run an older client.

    Mike 1/10 January 31, 2019

    PROXPN IS A SCAM

    I signed up for this service for about 10 minutes 3 years ago and then switched my account to free, every year they try to charge my credit card. The phone number on their website is disconnected, their address keeps changing every year and they never answer support emails.

    DO NOT USE PROXPN, THIS SERVICE IS A SCAM!!!

    Sotodrone 10/10 September 7, 2018

    ProXPN is worth it

    I love this VPN and have no complaints. I will first admit that this is the only one Ive ever paid for and as for the lack of fancy extra's I don't miss them. I want to not know that its there and to be anonymous and safe. If I drop the connection to ProXPN then they kill the connection to the web site and that is all I ask. As for the high price.... I paid for one year I think and got three years with a deal I heard on a talk show. I think but I am not sure thats the case and its been a long time, I think I should be past the time to reniew and still have it, but I don't know for sure the date or the length of the plan. I have used other vpn's and am not planning on going anywhere but ProXPN. The added selling point is no logs. They have no records to hand anyone so aside from Big Brother being able to see our logs before we get a chance to encrypt every thing else is good.... well it has that appearance and really what more can we ask.

    Anonymous 6/10 November 22, 2017

    Lacking diverse exit points

    ProXPN, solid service but lacking enough diverse exit points to be able to use Netflix or other streaming services.

    ProXPN, Windows desktop client has improved, but still can crash due to unknown issues, more than likely linked to Windows updates.